GC

 I do not support gender-critical feminism, in part because gender-critical feminism is idpol (see here for instance)

Based of off this post and similar ones by the gendercritical subreddit women:

The gendercritical subreddit women are messed up in the head

Most of the gendercritical subreddit people appear to be profoundly wounded and neurotic, in a permanent crisis regarding their relation to the social world.

Of course for gendercritical subreddit women ,being neuroses would be an improvement for them. They are pathological narcissists

But since, some gendercritical subreddit women, like all women are marginalized and victims of abuse by men I can see why the gendercritical subreddit women would have mental issues due to that marginalization and abuse. So I came off  sweetly and stupidly myopic on the subject above. (though the gendercritical subreddit women still sound retarded with posts in that subreddit)

Ironically these gendercritical subreddit people are pretty suited for convent life, despite how they all likely consider that religion an evil patriarchal tool.

The gendercritical subreddit women were born with d*ck in their brain

Again maybe I just don't understand, because I am a man and thus I need to acknowledge that almost literally every woman has been repeatedly abused by men thus excusing the gendercritical subreddit’s women’s weird posts.

One gendercritical subreddit said that adult male sexual interest in her peaked when she was a preteen  (though she admitted that she still is harassed, abused, etc even in her 30s) and she related a story about her young female children relatives being stared at by adult perverts men all the time (with said perverts men ignoring the adult females in the vicinity) - and young schoolgirls on the train. (though  the “men hungrily staring at children” part might be a delusional take. that is clearly rooted deep in misconceptions about society, to say the least)

So maybe things like that is why gendercritical subreddit women are deeply disgusted by and cynical about men

Maybe the gendercritical subreddit women are not fucked up in the head. Maybe they are merely reacting to men who are fucked in the head (which is true men are fucked in the head).

Though that is still no excuse for gendercritical subreddit women to utilize women’s experiences of sexual abuse at the hands of men to justify their stupid posts like how male children shouldn’t be born (or at least refuse to see their more extreme posts as utter depravity)? 

It is true that male violence towards women is real - obviously. But that doesn’t excuse the more unhinged and neurotic ideas that gendercritical subreddit women spew like how male children shouldn’t be born

However some women (like the gendercritical subreddit women) have been so very harmed by men that they don't want anything more to do with men, which includes not wanting to give birth to them. Though while some gendercritical subreddit women tend to have sympathy for women harmed in such a way, some of them finds that position is extreme

The experience of the gendercritical subreddit women that I posted above (albeit a point she and other gendercritical subreddit women often make in a ridiculously hyperbolic ways) are very real problems, and the solutions to these problems are really difficult and can take decades or centuries, but change is certainly possible-probable. 

Domestic abuse within marriages since the 1960s has been rightfully viewed as evil. Giving up and just hating and fearing everybody around and laser focusing on all real or imagined slight in the life of the gendercritical subreddit woman I mentioned above isn't gonna change anything, it's just going to make her and similar gendercritical subreddit women tormented.

I'm going to counterpoint above, I don't think any of these things mentioned by that above particular  gendercritical subreddit women "very real problems" in the Western world as much as he says, which is most likely where /u/12345thrw and the other privileged lame cronies on /r/GenderCritical subreddit are from because women in real third world countries that suffer problems in the ballpark of these claims are likely not hanging out on reddit. 

These are mostly very high exaggerations from gendercritical subreddit women like 12345thrw with mental health issues that have dug to the core of feminist ideology and use that core stuff to justify all of their failings/shortcomings in their TERF lives

gendercritical subreddit women like 12345thrw appear to have assumed the role of treemail of *all the pain* that *all* of the planet is throwing at TERFs like her. 

Is that why she and other gendercritical subreddit women thinks it's a okay to strip their brains of all filters and restraint and to take this aggressive stand of desiring a full category of people to not exist 

That is not good in any context. And 12345thrw needs help, not reddit karma. 

So hats off to the gold awarding reddit alien that does not get that she purposely stoking the pain, to deliver this performance on the gendercritical subreddit and similar terf subreddits,on social platforms etc, when she may really need better peers and caretakers in her real life . I am sorry her experience -at least how she tells-has been bad, i hope she gets better and stops being triggered each time that some one has a tough day and instead helps them out of it in good way ,rather than rant the problem into oblivion.

But maybe she doesn’t break down every time someone has a tough day

I don’t like the retarded comment saying that adoption is human trafficking

But there are many cases where that is true. Especially with kids from foreign countries, but even in the US too

Regardless the fact is that adoption as an industry which is poorly regulated and not very transparent. That alone should be a cause of concern about what is actually happening with adoption.

I'm sure this is a big issue but that is no excuse for all the gendercritical subreddit flailing moralistic doublespeak that is infesting their public discourse.

Though adoption is still adoption, and human trafficking is still human trafficking. If the point was that adoption is commonly used as a shield for human trafficking then a person could state that as such rather than to say that adoption is human trafficking (what is next: war is peace? freedom is subordination? speech is censorship?)

And, adoption is a moral good.

But adoption system, like so many human systems, is not good. We do not as a society make sure that the adoption system lives up to the virtue that is inherent with adoption. 

When the system is cronyish, it corrupts and is reflective of the corruption of all people who participates within it. 

But at the end of the day, everyone is let off the hook for its negatives because they were all "without power" to confront this reality. 

This is what liberalism 2.0 breeds, and it's the reason that we are all gloom and doomed under industrial capitalism. 

Because any person who tries to reform it and fight these injustices are deemed to be ruining it for everyone else who are participating in whatever cronyish system, since it works "good enough" even though it is salted with several of the worst crimes and criminality one can imagine.

​It's really insane. And then we have people who casually defend the system because what is of the upmost important to such system defenders is splitting hairs as opposed to looking at the system in its entirety. 

Because such people are not willing to see it for what it truly is, which is abuse, cruelty, brutality and exploitation to the depths of hell, because that challenges such peoples fantasy of the goodness and virtue of this one act.

Or maybe, adoption is a moral neutral,  as a concept, is virtually independent of the current system.

This though might not be about splitting hairs: doublespeak is a real issue that does nothing at all to solve anything; but does in fact the opposite of that. 

We don't get to muddy the waters and gaslight all because we are pointing at a-terrible-thing™. 

If there is a problem with the current system then we need to be clear, direct and exact - and not to twist words to say the opposite.

So to sum it up , whatever the heck evil schemes the US have about baby adoption is after all,  adoption and human trafficking is after all human trafficking. 

Words do matter and political vagueness is a communication disease. Yelling hot takes like "adoption is human trafficking" puts people who say that on 45 territory.

I do hold basically Radical Feminist ideas on material analysis, sex work/prostitution, gender roles, etc, I lack the mind bandwidth to grasp that “TERFs” and “dirtbag leftists” agree with me enough to support said TERFs and dirtbag leftists

Gendercritical subreddit women will faces new problems when climate change worsens. If we don’t embrace a class first politics approach that is able to overthrow capitalism and saving advanced civilization they and all of us on Earth are doomed.

I don't believe that Gendercritical subreddit women would be helped by climate change destroying our planet.

Gendercritical subreddit women are basically Femcels BTFO.

Sometimes TERFs show up and they act all reasonable (though I X Doubt that), saying they have rationalized critiques of the trans movement and the effect that it has on feminism. 

It's debatable to some degree, biological women may in their own vague way be noticeably different, they have non identical life experiences, biology that is differentish etc. 

However now you go to the archives of r/gendercritical and it's just stock full of people going out of their way to misgender transgender women, calling transgender women insults I refuse to post here that to them will never pass (but every part of politics are sexual pathology sniff. Goes double for anti-transgender people than it does for transgender people), claiming that Trans people are all sexist/misogynistic and kink/bdsm obsessed insult word (ha, that argument is ridiculous. It is a stereotype at best).

trying to become their own sexual fantasies, etc.. Those gendercritical reddit posts are, truly odd galaxy minded b.s. 

All the measured criticisms that those Terfs present to the outsiders fades away and then you are left with this strange "Incels, but women!" hells-cape.

I believe that reddit’s trans community has reinforced the harmful stereotype that trans women may tend to be sex obsessed and don't pass.

Here's the real s*it post. generally Redditors are insufferable weirdies and sadly trans redditors are still redditors and thus fall into the same trap

Reddit is a pretty large website that's really mainstream these days, whether that is good or bad is up for debate

Where am I able to find for a more balanced view of transgender people? Susan's Place? Substack? Somewhere the internet?

I read the gendercritical subreddit to get a handle of what a jaded-beyond-hope TERF is like (I am masochist), and what insecurities they display. But, like I don’t go there for politics at all.

I dunno. As a man I think it’s It is somewhat insightful to read the gendercritical subreddit to see the place where the worst experiences can lead TERFs. I feel maybe if I was a woman TERF I’d try and do the same thing the other way to get a handle on the same thing.

My reactions to posts on r/gendercritical 

“This is my first post here, so I would like to apologize in advance if I offend anyone here and I have absolutely no problem with people choosing to identify in any way they wish. What I do have a problem with is that many LGBTQ and trans rights activists love to push the idea that transgender women are the same as biological women. Newsflash: no, they are absolutely not. 

Trans women can't get pregnant. Trans women can't menstruate. They don't have a vagina. They don't have ovaries. They don't have a cervix. They don't have a uterus. They don't have XX chromosomes. These are all primary gender characteristics associated with women on a scientific level. I'm sure I will get called transphobic for saying this, but it is the scientific truth. 

I am not saying that trans issues are not legitimate, but what I am saying is that they shouldn't always encroach themselves into women's spaces. What brought this on for me is somewhere between people like Jessica Yaniv, Gamestop Tiffany, and others feeling entitled to enter women's spaces just because they say they are trans. Furthermore, the pad brand, Always, has started becoming more gender inclusive to appease trans women when they biologically cannot menstruate.”