Posts

Exh gedgtefgg

 From  https://web.archive.org/web/20190513111011/http://www.transkids.us/faq.html#common  What are the two types of M2F transsexual/transgender?  Its always been acknowledged in the scientific literature that there are two groups of transsexuals/transgender. In different classification schemes these are referred to as primary and secondary, early onset and late onset, true and marginal, core and non-core, ego-syntonic and ego-dystonic, and homosexual and autogynephilic. The first group is similar to homosexuals in development and are most commonly gay boys before they transition, and the second group is similar to heterosexual transvestites in development and most commonly transvestites before they transition. We therefore prefer to use the homosexual/autogynephilic terminology because while the others characterize the two conditions, this terminology articulates the nature of the two conditions and is etiologically more descriptive.  Homosexual Transsexuals/Tr...

Exh feytgyrfgh

Image
   

Exh abettybfr

Image
 

GC

 I do not support gender-critical feminism, in part because gender-critical feminism is idpol (see here for instance) Based of off this post and similar ones by the gendercritical subreddit women: The gendercritical subreddit women are messed up in the head Most of the gendercritical subreddit people appear to be profoundly wounded and neurotic, in a permanent crisis regarding their relation to the social world. Of course for gendercritical subreddit women ,being neuroses would be an improvement for them. They are pathological narcissists But since, some gendercritical subreddit women, like all women are marginalized and victims of abuse by men I can see why the gendercritical subreddit women would have mental issues due to that marginalization and abuse. So I came off  sweetly and stupidly myopic on the subject above. (though the gendercritical subreddit women still sound retarded with posts in that subreddit) Ironically these gendercritical subreddit people are p...

Blog Nav iii

  https://truepolblogiiii.blogspot.com/2022/10/exch-frtegh.html https://truepolblogiiii.blogspot.com/2022/11/exh-abettybfr.html https://truepolblogiiii.blogspot.com/2022/11/exh-adfesvgyh.html https://truepolblogiiii.blogspot.com/2022/10/exh-aerkb.html https://truepolblogiiii.blogspot.com/2022/10/exh-byrpfgtedff.html https://truepolblogiiii.blogspot.com/2022/10/exh-ccngdeed-ideas.html https://truepolblogiiii.blogspot.com/2022/11/exh-comm-ythfv.html https://truepolblogiiii.blogspot.com/2022/11/exh-csfrrgre.html https://truepolblogiiii.blogspot.com/2022/10/exh-dgtsghrdjj.html https://truepolblogiiii.blogspot.com/2022/11/exh-feytgyrfgh.html https://truepolblogiiii.blogspot.com/2022/11/exh-gedgtefgg.html https://truepolblogiiii.blogspot.com/2022/11/exh-gevhttjyrfmhg.html https://truepolblogiiii.blogspot.com/2022/11/exhibnotlleft.html https://truepolblogiiii.blogspot.com/2022/11/exh-idgyadfrfr.html https://truepolblogiiii.blogspot.com/2022/11/exh-jrdpntdn.html https://truepolblogiiii.blo...

Exh comm ythfv

https://www.reddit.com/r/shitliberalssay/wiki/index/ Communism killed 100–600 million The claim usually comes in part from a shitpiece called The Black Book of Communism, a work of sensationalist and apparently profascist tripe originally slapped together by professing ‘leftists’ to promote the status quo. The statistic was made using loose qualifications, such as millions of nonexistent Chinese babies being considered ‘victims’, relinquished households probably being considered ‘deaths’ (partially due to bureaucratic technicalities, most likely), and some automobile accidents being considered the fault of socialism. Many of the subtotals are not widely accepted by historians. The statistic also includes many socialists, such as Soviet soldiers and civilians who, of course, learnt about socialism in either schools or on their own. Add this to the fact that most of the victims weren’t straight white cismen either, and normally the statistic would become almost worthless for white antico...

Exh gefggggyyhhh

 Historically the of role of the Cathedral was fulfilled by religious institutions hence the usage of the term "cathedral", this is intentionally contrasted with the institutions that fulfill the role of the cathedral in the modern age that being Schools, Universities, the Media and the Entertainment industry who largely market themselves as "Secular".  It is worth to note that the Cathedral (in it's modern incarnation) is not a formal institution that people just belong to but rather an informal network of leaders of the before-aforementioned institutions that happen to agree on most important matters (Harvard, The New York Times, Disney and The Guardian rarely disagree for example) See this for more